TAGGED IN

Iran

  1. Iran blasts Trump for ‘racist mentality’ and hostility to Muslims over travel ban

    Tehran condemns Donald Trump’s order barring 12 countries’ citizens from entering US as violation of ‘fundamental principles of international law’ Tehran has denounced the US travel ban on Iranians and citizens of 11 other mostly Middle Eastern and African countries, saying Washington’s decision was a sign of a “racist mentality”. Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday reviving sweeping restrictions that echo the US president’s first-term travel ban, justified on national security grounds after a firebomb attack at a pro-Israel rally in Colorado. Continue reading...

    Iran Lashes Out at Trump Admin's New Sanctions: 'Washington Is Not Serious' About Nuclear Talks

    Iranian state-controlled media on Friday lashed out at the Trump administration’s latest round of sanctions, suggesting the move demonstrates that President Donald Trump is not sufficiently committed to a nuclear deal. "Despite earlier Iranian authorities' warnings that the sanctions show that Washington is not serious in the talks to resolve Western states' alleged concerns over the Iranian nuclear issue in exchange for the removal of sanctions, the US Treasury announced new sanctions on dozens of Iranian individuals and entities," Mehr News Agency wrote on Friday. The fresh sanctions, which target a multibillion-dollar Iranian money laundering network, are some of the furthest-reaching and most substantial to date. Thirty-five entities from Hong Kong to the United Arab Emirates appear on the list for laundering "billions of dollars through Iranian exchange houses and foreign front companies to sustain Tehran’s campaigns of terror," according to the State Department. They primarily center around Iranian brothers Mansour, Nasser, and Fazlolah Zarringhalam, who have leveraged an international network of money launderers to feed Tehran’s illicit "shadow banking" system. "The regime leverages this network to evade sanctions and move money from its oil and petrochemical sales, which help the regime fund its nuclear and missile programs and support its terrorist proxies," the Treasury Department said in a statement. The United States announced the measures just days after Iran rejected the Trump administration’s offer for a revamped nuclear deal that would have eventually zeroed out its uranium enrichment capabilities. Tehran labeled the deal a non-starter, with the country’s supreme leader saying that President Donald Trump "can not do a damn thing" about Iran’s contested enrichment program. Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei, blasted the American nuclear proposal for failing to guarantee full-scale sanctions relief in a Thursday interview. "The U.S. proposal does not even mention sanctions relief, which is a core issue for us," Shamkhani said, describing the latest draft deal as "unprofessional." Iran, he added, is "preparing a new draft" that will address sanctions relief and preserve Tehran’s right to enrich uranium. The sanctions—which could increase pressure on Iran to accept America’s terms for a deal or push it away from the negotiating table—also came just days after the Wall Street Journal noted that White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt issued an internal directive "to pause all new sanctions activity toward Iran" amid diplomatic talks with Tehran. The White House did not deny the claim, saying that "any new decisions with regard to sanctions will be announced by the White House or relevant agencies within the administration." It appears, however, that the policy is not in place, with both the State and Treasury Departments saying that they will not shy away from further action to cripple Iran’s access to much-needed cash. "The new policy went out to top officials at the National Security Council and Treasury Department, and then to the State Department," according to the Journal. "Relevant officials working on the Middle East were looped in, but the directive had to spread much further." The White House did not deny the report, saying that "any new decisions with regard to sanctions will be announced by the White House or relevant agencies within the administration." But it appears that policy either never existed or is no longer in place in light of Friday’s massive designations. Both the State and Treasury Departments said Friday that they will not shy away from further action to cripple Iran’s access to much-needed cash. "The United States will continue to deny Iran access to financial networks and the global banking system as long as Iran continues its destabilizing activities," spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said in a statement. "We will promote accountability for those who seek to undermine international peace and security." Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made a similar promise, saying his agency "will continue to leverage all available tools to target the critical nodes in this [Iranian] network and disrupt its operations, which enrich the regime’s elite and encourage corruption at the expense of the people of Iran." The new sanctions mark the "first action against Iran’s shadow banking network since the President issued" his National Security Presidential Memorandum on Iran in early February, according to the State Department. A U.S. official familiar with Trump’s thinking told the Washington Free Beacon that the move is an integral part of the president’s posture toward Iran. "As long as Iran continues to bankroll Hezbollah, Hamas, and other violent jihadists bent on destabilizing the Middle East and threatening our allies, this administration will relentlessly target and dismantle the regime’s financial networks," the official said. "Appeasement failed for decades. Today’s action is part of President Trump’s strategy of peace through strength." The post Iran Lashes Out at Trump Admin's New Sanctions: 'Washington Is Not Serious' About Nuclear Talks appeared first on .

    Bipartisan House Group Demands That Iran's Nuclear Program Be 'Totally Dismantled'

    A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is urging the Trump administration to reject any nuclear deal with Iran that permits uranium enrichment, with 3 Republicans and 13 Democrats demanding that the Islamic Republic's nuclear program be "totally dismantled." "We wholeheartedly agree that Iran must not retain any capacity to enrich uranium or continue advancing its nuclear weapons infrastructure," the lawmakers wrote in a Friday letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, originally reported by Jewish Insider. "There is widespread bipartisan support for this requirement and we appreciate your commitment to this essential cornerstone of any agreement." The bipartisan letter comes as the Trump administration sends mixed signals on whether it will allow Iran to continue enriching uranium as part of a new nuclear deal. While Trump officials have publicly called for completely dismantling Iran's nuclear infrastructure, news reports emerged earlier this week that the U.S. proposal to Tehran on Saturday allows limited, low-level enrichment on Iranian soil for an undetermined period. In May, 177 House Republicans issued a joint statement reiterating the GOP's longstanding support for a deal that prohibits Iran's uranium enrichment and entirely dismantles the country's nuclear program. Some Democratic senators have also expressed support for completely dismantling the program. In an April interview with the Washington Free Beacon, Sen. John Fetterman (D., Pa.) said the Trump administration should stop nuclear negotiations with Iran and eliminate the country's nuclear facilities with a military strike. "Waste that s—t," the Pennsylvania Democrat told the Free Beacon. "You're never going to be able to negotiate with that kind of regime that has been destabilizing the region for decades already, and now we have an incredible window, I believe, to do that, to strike and destroy Iran' nuclear facilities." The Friday group—led by Reps. Laura Gillen (D., N.Y.) and Claudia Tenney (R., N.Y.)—emphasized in the letter that "the Iranian regime must understand that the United States is unwavering in its demand that Iran's uranium enrichment capability be totally dismantled." The lawmakers also asked the Trump administration to submit any agreement with Iran for congressional review as part of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act. "For any agreement to endure, it must have strong bipartisan support," the letter reads. "We urge you to engage with Congress as negotiations proceed to ensure that any final agreement commands broad support." "We appreciate your leadership on this pressing matter vital to America's national security interests and stand ready to work in a bipartisan manner to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon," the lawmakers told Rubio and Witkoff. The post Bipartisan House Group Demands That Iran's Nuclear Program Be 'Totally Dismantled' appeared first on .

    Iran Turns to China for Ballistic Missile Materials as Nuclear Threat Grows

    While negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program appear to have made little progress, Iran is further arming itself, a new report indicates.   Iran has ordered materials for ballistic missiles from China as it seeks to bolster its military amid ongoing talks with the U.S. over its nuclear program, according to The Wall Street Journal.   China is sending shipments of ammonium perchlorate, a substance used in explosives, to Iran, people familiar with the purchase told the journal. The explosive material could be used in hundreds of ballistic missiles and is expected to arrive in the coming months. Iran may be planning to give some of the material to the Houthis in Yemen, according to the journal.   Iran is “increasing its military collaboration with China to rearm after Israeli strikes last year,” Robert Greenway, director of the Allison Center for National Security at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal. “The latest purchases would dramatically expand their offensive capacity to threaten Israel, U.S. forces, our partners and allies, and potentially disrupt global energy markets.”   Meanwhile, Iran has continued to enrich uranium and either already has or is very close to reaching nuclear weapons grade enrichment levels, according to the Heritage expert.   The U.S. and Iran remain engaged in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program but both sides appear to hold conflicting nonnegotiable standards for a deal.   President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and following reports of a deal that would allow for some uranium enrichment to continue in Iran, Trump said any deal with Iran will ban all enrichment. But Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi wrote on X Wednesday: “No enrichment, no deal. No nuclear weapons, we have a deal.”   Time is one of the key factors in the negotiations between Iran and the U.S., according to Greenway. Each day that goes by without a deal is another day Iran can continue enrichment.   “Iran is exploiting the negotiations to radically increase uranium enrichment,” Greenway said, citing a recent International Atomic Energy Agency report.   When discussions first began between Iran and the U.S. on April 12, the Trump administration set a deadline of two months to reach an agreement, making the deadline next week.   Israel has assured the U.S. it will not carry out preemptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities while talks between the U.S. and Iran are ongoing, Axios reports. While Israel has the ability to damage Iran’s nuclear facilities, Greenway says it would require U.S. involvement to carry out a strike large enough to effectively neutralize Iran’s nuclear threat. While there are fears a U.S. strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities could trigger a war, a recent report from The Heritage Foundation contended history has proven that such preemptive strikes usually do not result in a broader regional conflict. The post Iran Turns to China for Ballistic Missile Materials as Nuclear Threat Grows appeared first on The Daily Signal.

    Trump proclamation blocks nationals from 12 countries from entering US

    President Donald Trump issued a Proclamation Wednesday that implemented a nearly full travel ban on nationals from a dozen countries, severely restricting potential entry into the United States. The proclamation springs from an executive order issued during Trump’s first day in office that laid the foundation for the administration to enact extensive immigration control. Trump claimed the action served national security interests and limited instances of foreign nationals overstaying their visas: As President, I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people… Nationals of some countries also pose significant risks of overstaying their visas…which increases burdens on immigration and law enforcement…and often exacerbates other risks related to national security and public safety. Commentators have criticized the ban, pointing out that it disproportionately affects Muslim majority countries and African countries. Amnesty International’s secretary general Agnes Callamard lambasted Trump for the action, calling it inhumane: President Trump’s new travel ban is discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel. By targeting people based on their race, religion, or nationality, from countries with predominantly Black, Brown and Muslim-majority populations, this blanket ban constitutes racial discrimination under international human rights law. It also spreads hate and disinformation, reinforcing the notion that these populations are more likely to pose security risks or engage in acts of violence. Leaders of affected countries have also denounce the United States for the action. In a Facebook post, Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno announced a corresponding ban on U.S. citizens and jabbed at Trump for his recent receipt of a Qatari luxury jet: I have instructed the government in accordance with the principles of reciprocity and suspended the granting of visas to citizens of the United States of America. Chad has neither airplanes nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride. The ban extends almost completely to nationals of Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Additionally, more partial bans have been placed on nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The restrictions bear striking resemblance to Trump’s 2017 travel ban, which blocked travel to the United States from seven Muslim majority counties. Some of these countries—namely Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen—have suffered under both bans. Trump justified the current ban in almost identical fashion as the 2017 ban, relying on certain provisions of the Immigrant and Nationality Act (INA). Section 212(f) of the act allows the President to deny entry into the country if doing so “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.” The administration additionally cited 215(a), which allows the president to block individuals entry if they knowingly make false statements or otherwise engage in fraudulent-type activity. For both bans, Trump claimed that restrictions were not based on religion or race, but rather countries’ deficient screening processes, high terrorist activity, poor information sharing and high overstay rates. After facing multiple challenges, the Supreme Court ultimately upheld Trump’s first travel ban under the INA and Constitution. “We will restore the travel ban…and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country that was upheld by the Supreme Court,” Trump said. The post Trump proclamation blocks nationals from 12 countries from entering US appeared first on JURIST - News.

    Former Iran Hostages Not Keen on Prospective Trump Deal With Iran. Plus, the Floodgates Open on Karine Jean-Pierre.

    Know when to fold ‘em, know when to walk away: The Free Beacon's Jon Levine spoke to several of the Americans who spent more than a year in Iranian captivity during the 1979 hostage crisis to ask a simple question: What do you think about a Trump nuclear deal with Iran? Most, he reports, "reacted with ambivalence—or outright dismay." Eighty-year-old Clair Cortland Barnes, a former government comms specialist who spent 444 days in captivity, said he doesn't think Iran is "honorable" and will "break" any deal "as soon as they can." William Gallegos, a 21-year-old Marine Corps guard when he was taken hostage, had this to say about the Islamic Republic: "Whatever happens once Iran gets what they want? Then they screw everybody else over, and then it's done, and then it starts all over again." Another Marine vet, Kevin Hermening, said any deal must be built on "non-negotiable principles"—in other words, "I can't imagine my emotional state if this president made a deal allowing Iran to pursue the development of nuclear weapons." "The reactions from former hostages come at what appears to be an uncertain point in negotiations between the two sides," writes Levine. "While Trump has declared that Iran may not continue to enrich uranium as part of any new deal, U.S. media reports indicate that his administration's proposal may allow some enrichment." READ MORE: Former Iranian Hostages Speak Out: No Deal With the Ayatollah Shots fired: Over the weekend, the Trump administration reportedly presented Iran with a nuclear deal proposal that would allow the Islamic Republic to enrich uranium in the interim. It would be a significant concession—though Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei doesn't see it that way. In a defiant Wednesday speech, Khamenei lashed out at Trump and "the rude and arrogant leaders of America." He called the proposal "nonsense" and made his position on talks quite clear: "The U.S.'s first word is that Iran should not have a nuclear industry," he said. "Our response to America's nonsense claims is clear: they can not do a damn thing in this matter." "The remarks threaten to further derail already fragile diplomatic talks surrounding Tehran's contested nuclear weapons program," our Adam Kredo writes. "The Trump administration did not immediately respond to Iran's hardline approach, though a sixth diplomatic session is tentatively scheduled to take place this weekend." READ MORE: Iranian Supreme Leader Lashes Out at Trump Admin Amid Nuclear Talks: ‘Rude and Arrogant Leaders’ The jig is up: Just a few months ago, Karine Jean-Pierre said she didn't want to "rehash the past." "Like many of the things she said from the White House podium, that wasn't true," writes the Free Beacon's Andrew Stiles. Jean-Pierre on Wednesday unveiled her new book, Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines. As the title implies, Jean-Pierre is leaving the Democratic Party to register as an independent—"per the advice of a publicist, no doubt"—in a decision that was apparently driven by the party's "betrayal" of her old boss, Joe Biden. Within hours, the first black lesbian White House press secretary's former colleagues panned the move, attacking Jean-Pierre as a "grifter," revealing that she added a New York-based publicist to official White House emails in hopes of securing a cable news gig, and accusing her of only pursuing the book when she failed to secure that gig. Even Politico joined the pile-on, disparaging Jean-Pierre's "halting, ineffectual briefings" that "exasperated reporters and routinely offered material for the Republican Party's main account on X." Fact check: true. READ MORE: HISTORIC: Karine Jean-Pierre Becomes First Known Democrat to Leave the Party Because They Were Mean to Joe Biden In other news: The Trump administration notified Columbia University's accreditor that the Ivy League school is "in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws and therefore fails to meet the standards for accreditation." Without accreditation, Columbia would not be eligible for federal financial aid, including student loans. USA Today is concerned about the anti-Semitic firebombing in Colorado—not the attack, but rather the Trump administration's attempt to deport the attacker's family, including his daughter, who "moved to the United States with a dream of studying medicine." A federal judge blocked that attempt on Wednesday. The SAM project—Democrats' $20 million attempt to understand young men—is out with preliminary results: "The focus groups found that young men feel they are in crisis: stressed, ashamed and confused over what it means to be a man in 2025." What could have caused that? A cargo ship was abandoned in the Pacific after the EVs it was carrying from China "burned so stubbornly that the ship's fire suppression system was unable to contain it," according to the Washington Post, which described the incident as "another case of EVs catching fire, a chronic safety and public relations headache for the fast-growing industry." You don’t say. The post Former Iran Hostages Not Keen on Prospective Trump Deal With Iran. Plus, the Floodgates Open on Karine Jean-Pierre. appeared first on .

    Former Iranian Hostages Speak Out: No Deal With the Ayatollah

    Several Americans who spent more than a year as hostages of the Iranian regime beginning in 1979 reacted with ambivalence—or outright dismay—at the prospect of President Donald Trump cutting a deal with the Islamic Republic. "I don't think they're honorable," Clair Cortland Barnes, now 80, told the Washington Free Beacon from his home in Leland, N.C., referring to the Iranian government. "I think that whatever deal you make with them, they're going to break as soon as they can." Barnes, a former U.S. government communications specialist, spent 444 days in captivity at the U.S. embassy in Iran after it was overrun by radical Islamist followers of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. During his time in captivity, Barnes personally witnessed Iranians beating prisoners who attempted to escape. A Trump voter, Barnes was an outspoken critic of former president Barack Obama's Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and warned Trump that the Iranians are "liars" and that any agreement would only be "a paper deal." "I kind of consider the Iranians and Putin to be in the same boat," Barnes said. William Gallegos, a 21-year-old Marine Corps guard when he was taken hostage by the Iranian radicals, said he was "ambivalent" about a deal with his former captors. "Even though President Trump is a great negotiator, you know Iran; even if they make a deal, whatever happens once Iran gets what they want?" Gallegos asked. "Then they screw everybody else over, and then it's done, and then it starts all over again. And that's the way it's been for, what, 40-something years now." Gallegos, like Barnes, voted for Trump. After a career with the Marines, the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the Denver Police Department as a detective, he retired in 2019. In a 2009 oral history of the hostage crisis, he recalled the Iranians tying him up and blindfolding him. "It's just, just the way Iran is," Gallegos told the Free Beacon. "It's always been that way. You know, Iran doesn't care about anybody else. They never have, you know, since our situation, and it's, you know, it's like I say, once a deal is made, Iran always manages to break it, so it doesn't matter." The reactions from former hostages come at what appears to be an uncertain point in negotiations between the two sides. While Trump has declared that Iran may not continue to enrich uranium as part of any new deal, U.S. media reports indicate that his administration's proposal may allow some enrichment. Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei rejected the offer, calling it "nonsense" from the "rude and arrogant leaders of America." "The U.S.'s first word is that Iran should not have a nuclear industry," Khamenei said. "Our response to America's nonsense claims is clear: They cannot do a damn thing in this matter." For Kevin Hermening, who was a young Marine when he was taken prisoner, a deal can only work "if it is built on unambiguous strength and non-negotiable principles." Enrichment is one of his biggest red lines. "It's a hard no for me on uranium for enrichment, for weapons purposes," Hermening said. Hermening made clear that he does not believe Iran would use any enrichment for peaceful purposes, noting that the Obama deal had not allowed inspectors unfettered access to suspected nuclear sites. Obama's JCPOA allowed the Iranians to pursue allegedly peaceful enrichment, a provision against which critics—including Trump—railed. "In fact, the deal allowed Iran to continue enriching uranium and, over time, reach the brink of a nuclear breakout," Trump noted in 2018, the year he tore up the agreement. "I can't imagine my emotional state if this President made a deal allowing Iran to pursue the development of nuclear weapons," Hermening said. Other former hostages told the Free Beacon they would like to see a deal. "I hope that they will be reasonable and successful," said Kathryn L. Koob, a former Foreign Service officer at the embassy. Barry Rosen, the embassy's former press attaché, said he "absolutely" wants an Iran deal—but is skeptical that U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff will be able to get it over the finish line. "I don't want to see a war break out—another war break out—in the Middle East," Rosen said. Steven W. Kirtley, who was another Marine guard at the embassy, said he is supportive of a deal because it would be "good for the [United States]." "What is the alternative?" he asked. John W. Limbert, now 82, was a political officer at the embassy during the crisis and hung around in the Foreign Service after his release. He later served as deputy assistant secretary of state responsible for Iranian affairs and ultimately as U.S. ambassador to Mauritania from 2000 to 2003. "I'd like to see, you know, the U.S. and Iran, at least, be on some more positive track than we've been for the last 45 years," Limbert told the Free Beacon. "We can, we can continue doing what we've done for the last 45 years," he said. "But you know, unless you've been living in a tree, I mean, it's pretty obvious it hasn't accomplished much." The post Former Iranian Hostages Speak Out: No Deal With the Ayatollah appeared first on .

  2. In no surprise at all, Iran says it will do whatever it wants with its uranium

    I think that basically the Trump administration is doing some very good things, but that doesn’t mean I approve of everything it’s doing. Nor do I completely understand what’s behind everything it’s doing; sometimes there’s a hidden agenda that’s good, for example. In the case of the Iran negotiations about enriching uranium and developing nuclear weapons I confess I’m stumped, although I can guess. Maybe they’re a prelude to more pressure from the US. Maybe they’re a prelude to an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Maybe they’re a way to say, “well, we tried, anyway – and now the gloves are off (and/or Israel’s gloves are off?).” At any rate, here’s the latest news on it: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday defiantly rejected U.S. demands to halt uranium enrichment, declaring that the Islamic Republic will not concede to “the rude and arrogant leaders of America.” In a televised address, quoted by Reuters and the Associated Press, Khamenei insisted that “uranium enrichment is the key to our nuclear program, and the enemies have focused on the enrichment.” He went on to criticize the latest U.S. proposal, claiming it “contradicts our nation’s belief in self-reliance and the principle of ‘We Can.’” Yes, we can! Hope and change! Let’s hear if for the mullahs! Israeli Knesset member Tally Gotliv remarked: There was never a chance Iran would agree to a nuclear deal. Israel, as the nation responsible for its own security—and given Khamenei’s stated desire to eliminate the Zionists—should act accordingly and strike Iran’s nuclear facilities. Israel is fully capable of carrying out such an operation, and I believe that’s exactly what will happen,” she added. Time … will … tell. The post In no surprise at all, Iran says it will do whatever it wants with its uranium appeared first on The New Neo.

  3. Putin tells Trump Russia ‘will have to respond’ to Ukraine drone attack

    US president says phone call with Russian leader won’t lead to ‘immediate peace’ as Moscow rules out ceasefire Donald Trump has spoken for more than an hour with Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, but he conceded the talks would not lead “to immediate peace” in Ukraine, and warned that Russia would respond to Ukraine’s successful attacks this week on its airfields. The US president, who repeatedly claimed he could end the Ukraine war in 24 hours during his election campaign, did not attempt to discourage the Russian leader from retaliation, according to his description of the discussion on his Truth Social platform. He noted instead that Putin had offered to participate in US talks with Iran about its nuclear programme, which Trump claimed Tehran had been “slowwalking”. The programme has expanded considerably since 2018, when Trump withdrew from a multilateral agreement to constrain it in exchange for sanctions relief. Continue reading...

    Iranian Supreme Leader Lashes Out at Trump Admin Amid Nuclear Talks: ‘Rude and Arrogant Leaders’

    Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei lashed out at the Trump administration in a defiant Wednesday speech, calling the U.S. nuclear deal proposal "nonsense" and taking aim at "the rude and arrogant leaders of America." Iran, Khamenei said, will not accept any nuclear deal that limits its ability to enrich uranium. President Donald Trump, he added, "can not do a damn thing in this matter." "The U.S.'s first word is that Iran should not have a nuclear industry," Khamenei said in an address marking the death of the Islamic Republic’s founder, Ruhollah Khomeini. "Our response to America's nonsense claims is clear: they can not do a damns [sic] thing in this matter." "The rude and arrogant leaders of America repeatedly demand that we should not have a nuclear program," he continued. "They cannot do anything about this." The remarks threaten to further derail already fragile diplomatic talks surrounding Tehran’s contested nuclear weapons program. Though Trump and some members of his administration have repeatedly declared that Iran would not be able to enrich uranium in any form under a deal, recent reporting from Axios and the New York Times suggested that a deal could allow the Islamic Republic to enrich uranium at low levels while the United States facilitated the construction of new enrichment facilities managed by third parties. Iran hawks in Congress would almost certainly see such a deal as a concession—but Khamenei condemned the proposal as a nonstarter during his speech, calling it "useless" for Iran to build nuclear plants only to lose the ability to enrich uranium on its own in the long term. "The nuclear industry is a parent industry. Many scientific fields are affected by the nuclear industry," Khamenei said. "Uranium enrichment is the key to the nuclear issue, and the enemies have focused on enrichment." In subsequent X posts, Khamenei said he will not permit any negotiations around Iran’s enrichment capabilities. "To the American side and others we say: Why are you interfering and trying to say whether Iran should have uranium enrichment or not? That’s none of your business," he wrote. "The U.S.’s proposal is 100% against the spirit of ‘We can.’ What the U.S. is demanding is that you should have no nuclear industry at all and be dependent on them," he added. Iranian foreign minister Seyed Araghchi, one of the country’s top interlocutors, quickly backed Khamenei’s stance. "No enrichment, no deal," Araghchi tweeted. "Apart from significant financial resources and political vision, it requires a solid industrial base and a technological-academic complex that can produce necessary human resources and know-how. Iran has paid dearly for these capabilities, and there is no scenario in which we will give up on the patriots who made our dream come true." On Tuesday, Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian adopted the same position, indicating that Tehran’s senior leadership is aligned in opposing the reported U.S. proposal. "We will not compromise on our nuclear rights by any means; let them dream about it," Pezeshkian said. The United States "tells us that you have no right to enrich uranium, but no freedom-seeking person will accept bullying." The Trump administration did not immediately respond to Iran’s hardline approach, though a sixth diplomatic session is tentatively scheduled to take place this weekend. "Continuing enrichment on Iranian soil is our red line. This is a reality that all countries have accepted. Enrichment has now become a matter of national pride and honor for Iranians," foreign minister Araghchi said on Tuesday. The post Iranian Supreme Leader Lashes Out at Trump Admin Amid Nuclear Talks: ‘Rude and Arrogant Leaders’ appeared first on .

    Middle East Leaders Surprisingly Fine With Iran Enriching Uranium, Lankford Says

    Leaders in a handful of Middle Eastern countries are surprisingly sanguine about the prospect of Iran enriching its own uranium, Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told reporters Tuesday. During a May 22-29 trip to Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Israel, in which Lankford met with leaders of various countries, the senator said he was surprised to hear those leaders dismiss the threat of Iran’s uranium enrichment. He told The Daily Signal and other reporters that he pushed back, warning that if Iran can enrich its own uranium, it will likely develop a nuclear weapon. “The leadership in all the different countries were pleased to be able to hear that Iran was going to be able to keep enrichment of uranium,” Lankford said. “My response to them was, ‘No, no, they cannot.’” “The only countries in the world that enrich uranium also have a nuclear weapon,” the senator explained. “Every other country that has nuclear power, but not a nuclear weapon, they buy their uranium from the manufacturer, basically.” “So, I was pretty clear with all the different leaders in Lebanon and Iraq, and in Jordan, to say that that should not be allowed,” Lankford added. He said the Israelis shared his concern. “Why would the Americans say that the Iranians can keep their nuclear program, let’s say, I promise you that I’m not going to have a nuclear weapon,” he recalled them asking. “Why would we trust the Iranians? When have they ever kept their promises?” “So, they were pretty clear about that to say that the only way to be able to assure they don’t have a nuclear weapon and a path to a nuclear weapon is they don’t have a nuclear uranium program, as well,” Lankford concluded. Iran’s Influence Wanes The Trump administration has revived its “maximum pressure” sanctions on Iran—sanctions the Biden administration loosened—and launched new negotiations toward a potential deal. While the Biden-era loosening of sanctions allowed Iran to beef up its support for proxies in the region—such as Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and militias in Iraq—Israel’s military response to the Oct. 7, 2023 pogrom has devastated those Iranian proxies, allowing countries in the region to reassert themselves, Lankford said. The senator expressed hope that Lebanon may become stable and defend the rights of minorities. While the Iran-backed terrorist group Hezbollah once had an army at parity with the Lebanese government forces, Israel’s response to Hezbollah’s attacks has given Lebanon a real opportunity. “The Lebanese Armed Forces are devastating Hezbollah in the south,” Lankford noted. “With Israel striking and disabling Hezbollah … it has opened up an opportunity for the Lebanese Armed Forces to move in and to be the army for Lebanon—and not to be a competing army, but to be the army, the defender of Lebanon.” The senator mentioned reforms in Beirut that give him hope for pluralism in the country, and he noted that the Lebanese army is effectively an equal mix of Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims, and Christians. Hope for Syria Similarly, Iran’s loss of influence gives hope for Syria, a multi-ethnic state currently recovering from a decade-long civil war. While different factions within the country, such as the Western-aligned Kurds in the north, the Christian minorities, the Sunni and Shia factions, may want their own states, leaders in the region hope the country will stay together and succeed, Lankford said. “I would tell you the leadership of Iraqis, the Kurdish regional government, the leadership in Beirut, the leadership in Oman, and the leadership in Israel all want a functioning Syria,” he noted. “If you start dividing up Syria, it is divided into seven different nations.” Turkey, in particular, would oppose the creation of a separate Kurdish state, considering the large Kurdish minority in eastern Turkey, he noted. “For those Kurds that are in eastern Syria, the Kurds that are in the Kurdish regional government in northern Iraq, were very clear that they’re telling their Kurdish brothers to turn towards Damascus,” Lankford said. “The focus of their region is an autonomous sovereign Syria that has great diversity—like Lebanon has great diversity—and to be able to make that work where you actually protect the rights of the minority, but it shouldn’t be dominated by the Turkish government; it shouldn’t be dominated by the Iranians, certainly,” he added. Foreign fighters who desire to impose Sharia law—the political implementation of Islamic law—pose the greatest threat to Syria’s prospects, Lankford said. He noted that the country remains “a very, very violent place,” and if the government imposes Sharia, the country will “break into a total civil war again.” The senator also noted that the leaders he met praised President Donald Trump. “Every single leader and every place that we went to said thank you to President Trump for how he’s handling the negotiations,” Lankford said. “No one brought up President [Joe] Biden.” The senator also mentioned “The Mechanism,” a U.S. effort to coordinate security between the armed forces of Lebanon and Israel. He revealed on social media that Maj. Gen. Michael J. Lenney is leading this effort. Thank you, Major General Leeney and US personnel, for your leadership of the Mechanism in coordinating security efforts between the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). Thank you for your sacrifice and service to our country! pic.twitter.com/13amkAk3jY — Sen. James Lankford (@SenatorLankford) June 2, 2025 The post Middle East Leaders Surprisingly Fine With Iran Enriching Uranium, Lankford Says appeared first on The Daily Signal.

  4. BBC staff in London say their families are being ‘terrorised and punished’ by Iranian regime

    BBC says ‘sharp and deeply troubling escalation’ this year of Iran targeting families of UK-based BBC Persian journalists BBC staff in London say their families are being “targeted and punished” by the Iranian regime as it intensifies a campaign of intimidation against journalists and media outlets. There have been more than 20 “threat-to-life” incidents against people in the UK by Iran in recent years, according to the Metropolitan police counter-terrorism commander. Continue reading...

    Iran’s Leader: US cannot do a damn thing on nuclear issue

    Press TV – June 4, 2025 Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei says uranium enrichment is the key to Iran’s nuclear issue, dismissing US proposals for Tehran to ultimately stop all enrichment in the country. “The first word of the US is that Iran should not have a nuclear industry and should depend on the United States,” the Leader said in a televised speech from the mausoleum of Imam Khomeini in southern Tehran Wednesday. “Our response to the US’ nonsense is clear: they cannot do a damn thing in this matter,” the Leader said as Iran marked the 36th anniversary of the passing of the founder of the Islamic Republic. His remarks came after President Donald Trump on Monday evening looked to reaffirm his administration’s position when it comes to nuclear negotiations with Iran and said Tehran will not be allowed “any enrichment of uranium.” US media reports said Tuesday the Trump administration is proposing an arrangement that would permit “limited low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil for a to-be-determined period of time.” “Under the proposal, the United States would facilitate the building of nuclear power reactors for Iran and negotiate the construction of enrichment facilities managed by a consortium of regional countries,” The New York Times wrote. “Once Iran began receiving any benefits from those promises, it would have to stop all enrichment in the country.” Ayatollah Khamenei said, “Uranium enrichment is the key to the nuclear issue, and the enemies have also put their fingers on enrichment.” He cited the 1980s experience of US unreliability in providing fuel to Iran, when the United States and Europeans denied 20% enriched uranium to the Islamic Republic. “Why are you interfering? Whether Iran has enrichment or not, what does it matter to you? Who are you? the Leader said, addressing the US. Ayatollah Khamenei said Iran has achieved a complete nuclear fuel cycle with great efforts, adding the nuclear industry is not just for energy. “The nuclear industry is a parent industry. Numerous scientific fields are affected by the nuclear industry.” The Leader said Iran, with a growing, stable and authoritative political system born of a great revolution, has surprised the Western world. “The leader of our revolution is a great man whose presence in the world is still tangible after thirty-odd years since his passing, and the impact of his revolution is clearly visible to people around the world,” Ayatollah Khamenei said. “The sharp decline in America’s position in the world is due to his presence, and hatred of Zionists is due to his revolution,” he added. Ayatollah Khamenei touched on “a movement towards aversion to Western values” in the world, saying it is rooted in the revolution created by Imam Khomeini. “The Islamic Revolution of Iran surprised the Western world. They did not think that a single cleric, without equipment and financial resources, could lead a nation into battle,” Ayatollah Khamenei said. Continues … “5 Missile Bases Ready…” Iran’s Big Threat After Trump’s U-turn on “Limited Nuclear Activity” Offer Crux – June 3, 2025 — Source

Add a blog to Bloglovin’
Enter the full blog address (e.g. https://www.fashionsquad.com)
We're working on your request. This will take just a minute...